Evaluation of James McNeil Whistler's Crepuscule in Flesh Colour and Essay

Evaluation of James McNeil Whistlers Crepuscule in Flesh Colour and chiliad - Essay ExampleThis means that a perusal of most of Whistlers work will reveal little else than an artists creative impulses gone wild. Tonalism can be seen as a result of these creative impulses of Whistler. Whistlers 1866 Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green Valparaiso (910 x 1080 x 100 mm painting, cover on canvas, London Tate, N05065) is perhaps one of the earliest works that reflects the artists desire for tonalist attitudes. The painting is the first piece in a striking number of similar works that followed at the hands of Whistler. This indicates that the Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green Valparaiso (Figure 1) cannot be evaluated in isolation from these other associate works because they share similar traits and characteristics that eventually came to define tonalism. Another major thing to take note of is the relative unknown nature of Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green Valparaiso as not many tr eatises on art especially art from the tonalist genres control given it much focus1. However if the flow rate immediately before this painting in Whistlers liveliness is looked at, it will become very clear that it defines a personal rise uplion. In handle this personal rebellion from an already Maverick persona resulted in new nuances being painted into the heart of the world of art. The combination of various rebellious attitudes united with a distant past in the military gave birth to the Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green Valparaiso and its sister works that were all created in Chile and represented similar militaristic scenarios processed through the lens of an artists eyes. The sister pieces of the Crepuscule in Flesh Color and Green Valparaiso include The Morning after the Revolution Valparaiso, Nocturne in Blue and Gold Valparaiso talk (Figure 3) and the sketch for Nocturne in Blue and Gold Valparaiso Bay (Figure 4). Whistler possessed an uncanny genius for art from an early age2 and this in turn affected his personal choices on life and career. Being a rebel from the start, Whistler was quick to abandon his career with the military at West Point but this in turn left some unfinished desires with Whistler3. As the rebellion in the Spanish colony of Chile took on the shape of a warfare, Whistler was attracted to revisit the military based part of his persona. Speculation clay to why Whistler went to Chile some claim he was looking to satisfy his militarism based impulses from West Point4, others think that Whistler considered the rebellion of the Chileans as heroic5 term recent research suggests that he was selling arms to the Chileans. In any case, Whistler was an artist before he went to Chile and artists generally detest war because of its barbaric conduct. However Whistler still chose to go to Chile. Before this point in time Whistler had been rebelling from an ordinary life in order to fulfill his life of artistic desire6. Yet his voyag e to Chile reveals that now Whistler was rebelling from his artistic life in order to come to terms with a life where you have to work to make some money. This in turn indicates that Whistler was more or less at war with himself at this point in time and his accounts from the ship he travelled on show a Whistler who is disinterested in life and what happens around him. His personal infighting must have kept him well occupied on his journey from Spain to Chile. His first painting in this series of paintings, Crepuscule in Fle